The debate over water consumption in automotive interior materials often pits genuine leather against vegan alternatives, but the facts are more nuanced than many might assume. Genuine leather tanning does require water, much of it is recirculated or cleaned and reused, and automotive leather ultimately emerges as a responsible material choice when you measure its entire lifecycle. There’s also the important point that hides are a by-product of the meat industry, utilising a resource that might otherwise be discarded.

What may be surprising is how “vegan” or synthetic leathers often involve water-intensive processes, especially when factoring in the production of plastics or other chemical components. Simply labelling something “vegan” does not automatically make it environmentally superior. It reminds us to look deeper at production methods, resource management, and overall impact rather than rely on slogans or assumptions.

So, how do we decide what’s truly the more sustainable option? Should we place more value on the circular use of by-products or focus on new materials that might seem greener but come with their own hidden costs? These questions are especially relevant to the automotive sector, where both manufacturers and drivers increasingly care about sustainability.

Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dCF9e9YP